Feds, 35 states, 100,000 doctors support Vermont AG’s appeal over prescription privacy law

first_imgThe federal government, 35 states, organizations representing over 100,000 doctors, consumer groups and privacy experts have supported Vermont’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the state’s Prescription Confidentiality Law. Last week, Attorney General William Sorrell filed a brief arguing that Vermont’s law, which restricts the use of doctors’ prescription information for marketing purposes, is constitutional. Data mining companies, including IMS Health and PhRMA, a trade organization for the pharmaceutical industry, claim the law violates their First Amendment rights. The case, Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., No. 10-779, will be argued before the Supreme Court on April 26, 2011.Earlier this week, many organizations filed ‘friend of the court’ briefs supporting Vermont’s position. The U.S. Department of Justice argued the law is constitutional, as did the state of Illinois, joined by 34 other states and Washington, D.C. The Vermont Medical Society filed an amicus brief joined by other state medical societies, the American Academy of Family Practitioners, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Together, these groups represent over 100,000 physicians. The Vermont Medical Society explained physicians’ interest in ‘seeing that their patient relationships remain uncompromised by unduly intrusive targeted marketing practices of the pharmaceutical industry.’ The New England Journal of Medicine based its support for the law on a ‘deep respect for the privacy and confidentiality of the doctor-patient relationship.’ Consumer and privacy groups such as AARP, Public Citizen, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation warned that the commercial use of prescription records poses real risks to doctor and patient privacy and is not protected ‘speech.’Attorney General Sorrell applauded this strong showing of support for Vermont’s law. ‘I am very pleased to have the federal government, a bipartisan group of 35 states and many other respected organizations on our side as we prepare to defend this important law before the nation’s highest court.’ Governor Peter Shumlin stated that he ‘appreciates the Justice Department’s support for this commonsense measure to protect medical privacy and reduce healthcare costs.’Federal law restricts the sale of patient-identifiable information, but many pharmacies sell records that reveal which doctors prescribe which drugs, as well as the age and gender of the patient receiving the drug. Pharmacies sell this information to data mining companies who sell it to pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical companies use the data as part of targeted marketing strategies directed at individual physicians. The legislature enacted the Prescription Confidentiality Law at the request of doctors who objected to the practice and called it ‘an intrusion into the way physicians practice medicine.’ The law provides that doctors’ prescription information cannot be sold or used for marketing prescription drugs unless the doctor consents.The Vermont federal district court upheld the law but a divided panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that ruling in November 2010. That decision is now under review by the Supreme Court. The First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld similar laws passed in New Hampshire and Maine. A list of the case briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court is available here. Source: Vermont AG March 3, 2011last_img read more